Admit the mess we are in and reorganise/

We tend not to notice how far we have sunk. Australia is not in good shape. We need an unflinching assessment of our situation, and also to know we can fix it. [Published in The Canberra Times, 11 Jan 2024 – or so I’m told.]

We tend not to notice how far we have sunk. Under the daily torrent of instant news, and without the long-term perspective of a declining number of us oldies, it might seem as though Australia is basically in reasonable shape, though struggling a bit at the moment.

Australia is not in good shape. We are in a major social crisis. We live in a world of major crises. We need an unflinching assessment of our situation, and also to know we can fix it.

The price of housing is absurdly high, and now rents are soaring too. Both problems reflect a little-noticed banking dysfunction, among other factors. Inequality has increased dramatically, the result of deliberate neoliberal policies that favour the rich. Insecurity of employment and income has also risen dramatically, also by design.

Many people are scrimping essentials to pay the mortgage. Many are losing that struggle and are homeless. We imprison our children—kids as young as ten. How did we come to this?

Backyards are disappearing, not because of uppity blackfellas but because of developers and very high immigration rates. Few were willing to note out loud how our unemployment rate dropped markedly when the pandemic closed the immigration gates. Now, at the behest of big business, immigration and unemployment are pushing back up along with rents and city congestion. Bush is paved over for new suburbs, unspoilt beaches we knew as kids are under high-rise.

The rich don’t stimulate the economy, they speculate, push up property prices and buy expensive trinkets. Too many parasites leave the economy anaemic. Neoliberalism has been an economic failure and a social disaster.

Battlers can see the fat cats purring, resentment builds and scapegoats are attacked. We are divided and conflicted. Desperate people will look for desperate solutions. Trump says he’ll smash the system, Dutton copies him and fascism is on the rise around the world. We’ve been here before.

There is a treadmill and there are not enough jobs, by design. If you slacken you can fall off and be replaced. Even the bosses have to keep performing, always striving for more: more stuff, more resources used, more pollution dumped. We have built a machine that is consuming the world, literally. We must find the off switch before it kills us.

There is a way through. For four decades we’ve been urged or required to be selfish and competitive and our physical and mental health have suffered. But people are innately cooperative. We are highly social. We need to feel we belong and are valued, and we thrive when we do.

History may seem to teach us we are irredeemably selfish and violent, but that is the history of mass societies. Did you know the earliest Middle Eastern cities were not hierarchical, nor patriarchal? We are built to live in small, cooperative communities. Our innate social responses only work when we can look others in the eye.

Even with strangers we have the choice of whether to allow ourselves to be driven by fear or to presume the other person is a human being just like us, to invite a connection, to act from love. Gandhi, Jesus, Mandela showed us the way. Love and fear cannot coexist. The world needs more of that love just now.

We are still a wealthy society, but the wealth is misdirected. We can afford to take proper care of our old folks and the disadvantaged. That’s what caring people do. We can afford to educate our kids in public schools, like we used to. We can afford to help struggling kids instead of caging them.

If we raise the minimum wage by fifty percent or more people will have more to spend and the economy will be stimulated. A recent Nobel prize was awarded for showing that it works in the real world. In the postwar decades last century unemployment was below 2%, wages rose steadily, the economy grew rapidly and many people were able to afford a house and a car for the first time. By now we have enough, but we need to see the wealth is shared around more fairly.

We need to get serious about reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The government is still approving mines and obstructing progress, despite its window dressing.

We know how to grow food while building the soil, so it holds more water and more carbon as well. We are learning how to use fire to keep the forests healthy and stop the megafires.

The startling truth is that most of the ideas by which we have been governed are wrong. My new book A New Australia: Discarding Delusions and Organising for the Wellbeing of All (Betternature Books, 2023) takes a broad and deep look at our situation, and who we are, and outlines a practical path to a much better future.

We can learn to live within the biosphere again. Our quality of life will immediately start to improve if we go about it sensibly. We need to take back control and get on with it.

4 thoughts on “Admit the mess we are in and reorganise/

  1. As part of the biological group of the many different creatures on our planet, our behavior must also be within nature. Although we often regard our actions as being artificial with regard to natural processes, but this cannot be correct, due to our being a part of nature. Does this make the activities of our business world not natural? When when taken in a community sense, can the growth of cities be seen as so greatly opposed to natural growth or is it an advanced part of it?

    Like

  2. Thanks David. Yes we are from nature, but since we started living in large settlements and farming limited crops and animals we have lost a lot of connection with the complexity of the natural world. The epitome of this is to claim we are the lords of creation who can control the rest of the living world. We cannot. We need to ensure our societies operate within nature.

    Like

    1. Thanks sackergeoff. Then since we agree that we do still complies with much of the way nature operates, why can’t our experts in the study of our social system of macroeconomics, develop a better explanation about it that does not oppose this fact? –one that allows the natural aspects to be seen and recognized for what they do? These days there are so many conflicting theories about the way our society works (and many of them are biased towards a political, religious or commercial doctrines) that we cannot see the woods for the trees!

      To oppose this disturbing trend, I have written a 310-page book “Consequential Macroeconomics–Rationalizing About How Our Social System Works”, about how it REALLY operates. This is after the use of more exacting definitions tell us of what its operational aspects ACTUALLY do consist. Unlike past explanations, this one is based on logic instead of intuition. It assumes that our part of nature must operate in a logical way, when mankind gets involved in it.

      The start (and reduction to a minimum) of the complexity is resolved with the introduction of a philosophy of “conflicting duality”, through the axiom that we seek to satisfy our needs with the least effort, whilst that these desires are unlimited. The model that represents our system may be seen in SSRN 2865571 “Einstein’s Criterion Applied to Logical Macroeconomics Modelling” which is on the internet or directly available from me. chestdher@gmail.com

      Like

Leave a comment